jamiebowen0306 (jamiebowen0306) wrote,

  • Location:
  • Mood:
  • Music:

I went to see "Brothers"

I went to see Brothers today. It stared Natalie Portman, Jake Gyllenhall and Tobey McGuire. McGuire plays the "good brother" as your typical all American type, quarterback on the football team, captain in the marines, married (to Portman), and two kids. The all round good egg as it were. Gyllenhall, by comparison is the "bad son" who has done time (for a bank robbery we later find out), and has always been run down by his Dad (played by Sam Shepard).

McGuire is sent to Afghanistan, and is presumed dead when his helecopter crashes in the middle of nowhere. Feeling remorseful, Gyllenhall starts doing odd jobs for Portman, who is grieving as he (and his friends) do things like assemble a new kitchen for her.

When it turns out that McGuire had been picked up by Afghan rebels, only to be released later, he is flown back to the US where he struggles to reintegrate himself into his family and "normal life." The rest of this film watches this attempt at integration.

The film sort of irritated me, for a couple of reasons. It's set in the upper midwest. I don't think that works for the film. Both brothers came across as a little stiff. If it had been set in Texas say, where they could be more like "good ol' boys," I might have believed them more.

Secondly, I hated the fact that the film seemed to be saying that you need to do something dreadful to get Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. McGuire came back from Afghanistan a broken man, and the film seems to imply that that only happened because of one act he had to do. As far as I'm aware, it doesn't have to be like that, and it irritates me that the film lessens what PTSD sufferers go through, because of that implication.
Tags: film, film review, review

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.